Interaction between races is shaped by:
class
district
visibility
Perception changes depending on status and setting.
Higher class = controlled bias
Lower class = direct or reactive behaviour
Elite โ dismissive, controlled distance
Working โ competitive, often hostile
Slums โ mixed, tense
Elite โ tolerant if useful or refined
City โ respected in trade
Working โ neutral to cautious
Elite โ polite but distant
City โ functional acceptance
Working โ suspicious
Slums โ reactive
Elite โ distant, rarely engage
City โ limited acceptance
Working โ wary
Slums โ direct, often hostile
Elite โ forced respect
Working โ resentment, competition
Slums โ hostility or indifference
General โ neutral
Less tension than with English
General โ mixed
Can mirror English attitudes or remain neutral depending on environment
Elite โ respectful but aware of hierarchy
City โ cooperative
General โ cautious
General โ neutral
Less direct conflict
General โ distant
Behaviour varies by class and exposure
General โ cautious, respectful
Aware of hierarchy
General โ neutral
Limited direct conflict
General โ neutral
Interaction mostly through trade
General โ neutral
Shared lower positioning but limited alignment
General โ cautious
Aware of high scrutiny
General โ neutral
Shared lower-class environments
General โ distant
General โ closest alignment
Shared environment and experience
General โ cautious but more socially adaptable
General โ neutral
Interaction varies by environment
General โ neutral
General โ strongest alignment
Shared positioning and environment
Upper class:
behaviour controlled
bias subtle
Middle class:
behaviour structured
bias present but restrained
Working class:
behaviour direct
bias visible
Slums:
behaviour reactive
bias immediate
West (Mayfair / Royal):
strict social boundaries
high judgement
City:
function over race
Soho:
mixed, more tolerant
South / East:
practical, tension present
Slums:
survival overrides structure
Race affects perception
Class determines behaviour
Location determines outcome